Transform Your Legacy Monolith System Into Microservices
Discover how this microservices design pattern can do it smoothly
Hey there 👋 - Amrut here!
Happy Sunday to all synced with The Tech Pulse!
Are you grappling with the daunting task of modernizing your outdated, monolithic software systems?
You're not alone.
The prospect of migrating to a more scalable microservices architecture can be overwhelming, fraught with downtime risks, complexity, and potential system failures.
In today’s newsletter issue, I discuss a strategic approach to transforming a legacy monolith application into microservices using the Strangler Fig Pattern.
You'll learn:
What is the Strangler Fig Pattern and the origin of the term
How does the pattern breakdown a monolith app into microservices
Step-by-step implementation guide
Key strategies for a smooth transition
Best Practices to follow during implementation
Common Pitfalls to avoid
Let’s dive in.
But First An Announcement…
I have launched a new YouTube Channel. (I think the time has come to put a face to this newsletter 🙂 ).
Also, it is a great platform for covering and explaining technical topics I cannot cover in my newsletters.😃
Feel free to show some ❤️ by subscribing to this channel. Share it with your friends and family if you find my content valuable.
YouTube: @realamrutpatil
With that out of the way, let’s circle back to today’s topic of discussion: The Strangler Fig pattern.
Introduction
The Strangler Fig pattern is a software development approach that gradually transforms a legacy system into a new one, typically moving from a monolithic architecture to a microservices architecture.
The essence of this pattern lies in incrementally replacing specific pieces of functionality with new applications and services.
Over time, these new components 'strangle' the old system, eventually replacing it entirely.
This approach allows for a smooth transition by enabling the new system to slowly take over the responsibilities of the old system, piece by piece.
It minimizes the risks associated with a full-scale replacement, such as downtime or system instability, and allows for continuous testing and integration.
Brief History and Origin of the term
The term "Strangler Fig" is borrowed from a peculiar type of fig tree, the Strangler Fig, found in rainforests.
These figs start their life as seeds that germinate high up on other trees. Gradually, their roots descend the host tree's trunk, enveloping it completely.
Over time, the fig's roots thicken and form a lattice around the host tree's trunk, constricting and overshadowing it.
The host tree eventually dies and rots away, leaving the fig tree standing independently, having effectively 'strangled' its host.
In software architecture, the legacy system is like the host tree.
The new microservices grow around it, slowly taking over its functions until the legacy system becomes obsolete and can be removed without disrupting its functionality.
How does the Strangler Fig Pattern Break Down a Monolith Application into Microservices?
In a typical monolithic application, different functionalities, such as user handling, data processing, and UI generation, are tightly coupled in a single codebase.
The Strangler Fig pattern approaches this by:
Identifying Independent Modules: Start by identifying functionalities within the monolith that can be independently developed and deployed. These are typically modules with well-defined boundaries and interfaces.
Building Microservices: Develop microservices to replicate these identified functionalities. Each microservice should be responsible for a distinct aspect of the application, such as user authentication or payment processing.
Routing Mechanism: Implement a routing mechanism that directs specific requests from the old system to the corresponding new microservice. This could involve using API gateways or proxies.
Incremental Replacement: Gradually increase the number of requests or functionalities handled by the new services while decreasing the monolithic application load.
Decommissioning: The monolithic application can be fully decommissioned once all functionalities are transferred to the microservices.
The Idea of "Strangling" the Old System
The 'strangling' aspect refers to slowly moving functionalities and traffic from the old system to the new without a big-bang approach.
This gradual shift ensures minimal end-user disruption and allows continuous monitoring and adjustment.
It also reduces the risks of migrating to a new system, as problems can be identified and resolved in smaller, manageable segments.
For example, consider an online retail application built as a monolith.
Using the Strangler Fig pattern, the development team builds a new microservice for handling product inventory.
They then route all inventory-related requests to this new service.
Over time, more services are developed for order management, user profiles, and payment processing.
Each new service takes over its respective functionality from the monolith.
Eventually, the monolithic application is fully replaced by these interconnected microservices, each optimized for its specific task.
Step-by-Step Implementation Guide
Implementing the Strangler Fig pattern involves several strategic phases.
Each phase is designed to ensure that the transition from a monolithic architecture to a microservices-based system is smooth manageable, and minimizes disruption to ongoing operations.
Assessment and Planning
Analyze the Monolith: Start by understanding the existing monolithic application. Identify its functionalities, dependencies, and potential areas for modularization.
Define Goals: Establish clear objectives for what you want to achieve with the transition, e.g., improved scalability and easier maintenance.
Identify Modularization Boundaries
Decompose into Modules: Break down the monolithic application into logical modules. Look for areas with low coupling and high cohesion.
Prioritize Modules: Determine which modules should be transitioned first based on business value, complexity, and dependencies.
Develop Microservices
Build New Services: Start developing microservices for the prioritized modules. Ensure they adhere to microservices’ best practices like single responsibility and independent scalability.
API-First Approach: Design APIs that will allow the new microservices to communicate with the existing monolith and each other.
Implement Routing Mechanism
Routing Layer: Set up a routing layer (like an API gateway) to direct traffic between the monolith and new microservices.
Gradual Transition
Incremental Shift: Gradually shift functionalities from the monolith to the new services. Start with low-risk modules to test the waters.
Monitor and Iterate: Continuously monitor the performance and adapt your approach based on feedback and issues encountered.
Decommissioning the Monolith
Phase Out: As more functionalities get transferred to microservices, start phasing out parts of the monolith.
Final Decommissioning: The monolithic application is fully decommissioned once all critical functionalities are migrated.
Key Strategies for a Smooth Transition
Transitioning to microservices while maintaining your monolith app can be tricky. Here are some strategies you can adopt:
Comprehensive Monitoring
Implement a robust monitoring system to track the performance and health of both the monolith and new microservices.
Feature Flagging
Use feature flags to toggle between old and new functionalities, allowing easy fallbacks and A/B testing.
Database Considerations
Carefully plan how to handle data migration and database refactoring, which can be one of the most challenging aspects of the transition.
Continuous Delivery
Adopt a continuous delivery model to release updates and new functionalities regularly and reliably.
Best Practices To Follow During Implementation
Follow these best practices while implementing the Strangler Fig pattern:
Start Small and Scale Gradually
Begin with less critical components of the monolith. This allows you to gain experience and confidence before tackling more significant elements.
Maintain a Clear Interface Between Services
Define clear APIs between the new microservices and the existing monolith. This separation is crucial for independent scalability and maintenance.
Prioritize Documentation
Keep documentation updated for both the legacy system and new microservices. This is essential for understanding the system as a whole during the transition.
Adopt an Incremental Testing Approach
Implement thorough testing at each stage of the migration. This includes unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end tests.
Ensure Team Alignment and Training
The team should be well-aligned with the migration plan. Continuous training on microservices architecture and the adoption of new technologies is vital.
Plan for Data Migration
Plan carefully to migrate data from the monolithic architecture to the new microservices. This often includes making decisions about database refactoring or replication.
Emphasize Monitoring and Logging
Implement robust monitoring and logging to identify and address issues quickly. This is crucial for both the old and new parts of the system.
Regularly Refactor as Needed
Continuously refactor the new microservices and the remaining monolith to improve the system incrementally.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Here are some pitfalls you can avoid:
Underestimating the Complexity
Transitioning to microservices can be more complex than anticipated. Underestimating this can lead to insufficient planning and resource allocation.
Neglecting the Monolith
It’s essential to maintain the monolith during the transition. Neglecting it can lead to performance issues and downtimes.
Inadequate Testing
Insufficient testing can lead to significant issues when parts of the system are migrated. This can affect both the new and existing functionalities.
Overcomplicating the Microservices Design
Creating too many microservices or overly complex architectures can lead to difficulties in management and maintenance.
Ignoring Cultural and Team Changes
Moving to microservices often requires changes in team structure and development culture, which, if ignored, can hinder the transition.
Key takeaways
The Strangler Fig pattern offers a gradual, controlled approach to transitioning from a monolithic to a microservices architecture, minimizing disruption.
By breaking down the migration into manageable parts, this pattern significantly reduces the risks associated with a Big Bang approach.
It allows for continuous testing, deployment, and improvement, ensuring the system remains robust and scalable throughout the transition.
The result is a more flexible, scalable system that can adapt to changing business needs more efficiently than a monolithic architecture.
Further Reading
Books
"Building Microservices" by Sam Newman: A comprehensive guide to developing microservices.
"Microservices Patterns" by Chris Richardson: Offers insights into various microservices patterns, including the Strangler pattern.
Online Resources
Martin Fowler's Blog: Rich insights into various software architecture patterns, including the Strangler Fig pattern.
Microservices.io: A valuable resource for understanding microservices architecture and patterns.
2 Tweets of the week
Whenever you’re ready, there are 3 ways I can help you:
Are you thinking about getting certified as a Google Cloud Digital Leader? Here’s a link to my Udemy course, which has helped 465+ students prepare and pass the exam. Currently, rated 4.2/5. (link)
I have also published a book to help you prepare and pass the Google Cloud Digital Leader exam. You can check it out on Amazon. (link)
Course Recommendation: AWS Courses by Adrian Cantrill (Certified + Job Ready):
AWS Solutions Architect Associate (link)
AWS Developer Associate: (link)
ALL THE THINGS Bundle: (link)
Note: These are affiliate links. That means I get paid a small commission with no additional cost to you. It also helps support this newsletter. 😃
Thank you for investing your time in reading this post.🙏
I'm always looking for topics that resonate with my audience. If there's a specific subject you'd like to know more about or discuss, I welcome you to reply right here.
If you found value in this newsletter issue and think others might too, it would mean the world to me if you could take a few moments to share it with your loved ones, colleagues, friends, or anyone who might benefit.